'Pay N21M To Brutalized Victim In Cross River’- Court Orders NSCDC
‘Pay N21m To Brutalized Victim In Cross River’- Court Orders
NSCDC
by Ameborguy
NAIJA NEWS
A Federal High Court sitting in Calabar has ordered the Nigeria
Security and Civil Defence Corps, (NSCDC) to pay the Managing
Director, Ultimate Frank filling station, Okuku in Yala local
government area of Cross River, Messrs Frank Oko and his staff,
Raphael Ogbe the sum of N21m as damages.
The duo in a Suit No. FHC/CA/FHR/47/2016 sought for the
enforcement of their fundamental rights brought pursuant to
section 46 (1) of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of
Nigeria, 1999 (as amended) as well as order 11, rules 1 of the
fundamental rights enforcement procedure) rules 2009 against the
respondents (NSCDC) and prayed the court for an order for the
enforcement of their fundamental human rights.
In the judgement delivered by Justice I E Ekwo, the Judge said,
having perused the oral and documentary evidences on both sides,
“I am unable to find where in the entire defence of the
respondents, where the case of the applicant has been
controverted with credible evidence.
“I have noted that the respondents have sought to controvert the
documentary evidence of the applicant particularly Exibit MEU 2,
MEU 3A, 3B, 3B, 3C, 3D, 3E and 3F using oral evidence, which is
the averment in the counter affidavit.”
He held that the law was trite that documentary evidence cannot
by any measure be varied or demolished by oral evidence.
The position of the law, according to him, is that, once
documentary evidence supports oral evidence, such oral evidence
becomes more credible.
Having taken a critical look at the suit and counter affidavits of
the parties in the case, the trial Judge, in his opinion, noted that
the defence of the respondents did not hold water.
“I find that the 3rd–7th respondents are unable to justify their
action; I am forced to note that the defence of the respondents
is porous in its entirety, reliant on affidavit evidence. I find that
the case put forth by the applicant has not been successfully
discredited by the respondents, and I must therefore, attach
probative value thereto”, the court held.
He noted that the case must therefore, succeed on its merit as he
has evaluated the affidavits and documentary evidence of the
applicant and found them to be admissible,
relevant, credible,
conclusive and more probable than that tendered by the
respondents.
“I agree with the learned counsel for the applicant that apology
and compensation are consequential where the court finds that
the fundamental rights of a person are breached”, he said.
In line with the aforesaid, the trial Judge gave an order directing
the respondents to jointly and severally pay to the applicants
damages totalling N21million for breaching their fundamental
rights.
Reacting to the judgement, Oko said that the judiciary was the
last hope of a common man, stressing”I am happy about the
judgement”
Mba Nkweni, SAN, and others (Council to the applicants), had
told the court that the arrest of the suspects, detention, assault,
battery, humiliation and brutalization by the respondents
(NSCDC) is wrongful, illegal and unconstitutional, callous,
inhuman and a blatant violation of the applicant’s fundamental
rights.
He said that the action of the respondents, particularly, the 3rd to
the 7th respondents in brutalizing, intimidating and traumatizing
the applicant, extorting and seizing/confiscating monies from him
without any lawful cause all amounts to abuse of office as
against their statutory responsibilities and powers as provided for
in the NSCDC Acts, No. 6 of 2007; Cap N146 Laws of the
Federation of Nigeria, 2010.
In view of this, the SAN said he was seeking an order directing
the respondents to pay the applicant the sum of One hundred
thousand Naira (N100, 000) extorted from them before releasing
the applicant and three other persons on the 7th January, 2016.
The SAN also said that the sum of Eight hundred and sixty
thousand naira (860,000) was seized, confiscated or stolen from a
Highlander Camry car, No. ABJ 903 HY driven into the
respondents’ premises by the applicant, only.
Consequently, the SAN requested for an order of mandatory
injunction directing the respondents to jointly and severally pay
the applicant the sum of two hundred thousand naira only being
his total medical bill for his treatment at the police clinic, Ogoja
occasioned by the assault and battery on him by the respondents.
“An order further directing the respondents to jointly pay the
applicant the sum of two hundred thousand naira (#200,000) only
per day, and for the 25 days the respondents detained the
applicant’s truck with Reg. No.UMA 77 YW on the false and
erroneous allegation that the applicant was diverting the AGO in
the tanker amounting to a total of Five Million Naira (#5,000,000)
only for depriving the applicant of the use of the vehicle.
“The applicant is further directing the respondent to tender a
written unreserved public apology to the applicant within thirty
( 30) days from the date of the judgement which should be
published in at least, three national dailies or as may be directed
by the court among others.
He said the respondents violated the applicants rights to his
personal liberty, the dignity of his person and freedom of
movement. It further stated that the respondent,
acted contrary
to the provisions in the NSCDC Acts, No. 6 which empowers
them to maintain peace and order, protection and rescuing of
civil population during emergencies among other duties.
Share This Post on Facebook!
NSCDC
by Ameborguy
NAIJA NEWS
A Federal High Court sitting in Calabar has ordered the Nigeria
Security and Civil Defence Corps, (NSCDC) to pay the Managing
Director, Ultimate Frank filling station, Okuku in Yala local
government area of Cross River, Messrs Frank Oko and his staff,
Raphael Ogbe the sum of N21m as damages.
The duo in a Suit No. FHC/CA/FHR/47/2016 sought for the
enforcement of their fundamental rights brought pursuant to
section 46 (1) of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of
Nigeria, 1999 (as amended) as well as order 11, rules 1 of the
fundamental rights enforcement procedure) rules 2009 against the
respondents (NSCDC) and prayed the court for an order for the
enforcement of their fundamental human rights.
In the judgement delivered by Justice I E Ekwo, the Judge said,
having perused the oral and documentary evidences on both sides,
“I am unable to find where in the entire defence of the
respondents, where the case of the applicant has been
controverted with credible evidence.
“I have noted that the respondents have sought to controvert the
documentary evidence of the applicant particularly Exibit MEU 2,
MEU 3A, 3B, 3B, 3C, 3D, 3E and 3F using oral evidence, which is
the averment in the counter affidavit.”
He held that the law was trite that documentary evidence cannot
by any measure be varied or demolished by oral evidence.
The position of the law, according to him, is that, once
documentary evidence supports oral evidence, such oral evidence
becomes more credible.
Having taken a critical look at the suit and counter affidavits of
the parties in the case, the trial Judge, in his opinion, noted that
the defence of the respondents did not hold water.
“I find that the 3rd–7th respondents are unable to justify their
action; I am forced to note that the defence of the respondents
is porous in its entirety, reliant on affidavit evidence. I find that
the case put forth by the applicant has not been successfully
discredited by the respondents, and I must therefore, attach
probative value thereto”, the court held.
He noted that the case must therefore, succeed on its merit as he
has evaluated the affidavits and documentary evidence of the
applicant and found them to be admissible,
relevant, credible,
conclusive and more probable than that tendered by the
respondents.
“I agree with the learned counsel for the applicant that apology
and compensation are consequential where the court finds that
the fundamental rights of a person are breached”, he said.
In line with the aforesaid, the trial Judge gave an order directing
the respondents to jointly and severally pay to the applicants
damages totalling N21million for breaching their fundamental
rights.
Reacting to the judgement, Oko said that the judiciary was the
last hope of a common man, stressing”I am happy about the
judgement”
Mba Nkweni, SAN, and others (Council to the applicants), had
told the court that the arrest of the suspects, detention, assault,
battery, humiliation and brutalization by the respondents
(NSCDC) is wrongful, illegal and unconstitutional, callous,
inhuman and a blatant violation of the applicant’s fundamental
rights.
He said that the action of the respondents, particularly, the 3rd to
the 7th respondents in brutalizing, intimidating and traumatizing
the applicant, extorting and seizing/confiscating monies from him
without any lawful cause all amounts to abuse of office as
against their statutory responsibilities and powers as provided for
in the NSCDC Acts, No. 6 of 2007; Cap N146 Laws of the
Federation of Nigeria, 2010.
In view of this, the SAN said he was seeking an order directing
the respondents to pay the applicant the sum of One hundred
thousand Naira (N100, 000) extorted from them before releasing
the applicant and three other persons on the 7th January, 2016.
The SAN also said that the sum of Eight hundred and sixty
thousand naira (860,000) was seized, confiscated or stolen from a
Highlander Camry car, No. ABJ 903 HY driven into the
respondents’ premises by the applicant, only.
Consequently, the SAN requested for an order of mandatory
injunction directing the respondents to jointly and severally pay
the applicant the sum of two hundred thousand naira only being
his total medical bill for his treatment at the police clinic, Ogoja
occasioned by the assault and battery on him by the respondents.
“An order further directing the respondents to jointly pay the
applicant the sum of two hundred thousand naira (#200,000) only
per day, and for the 25 days the respondents detained the
applicant’s truck with Reg. No.UMA 77 YW on the false and
erroneous allegation that the applicant was diverting the AGO in
the tanker amounting to a total of Five Million Naira (#5,000,000)
only for depriving the applicant of the use of the vehicle.
“The applicant is further directing the respondent to tender a
written unreserved public apology to the applicant within thirty
( 30) days from the date of the judgement which should be
published in at least, three national dailies or as may be directed
by the court among others.
He said the respondents violated the applicants rights to his
personal liberty, the dignity of his person and freedom of
movement. It further stated that the respondent,
acted contrary
to the provisions in the NSCDC Acts, No. 6 which empowers
them to maintain peace and order, protection and rescuing of
civil population during emergencies among other duties.
Share This Post on Facebook!
Comments
Post a Comment